By viewing the sequence in which the young protagonist of the film is savagely attacked by a gang of criminals, the director realizes the dress of the girl has gone up a little more than usual, revealing a fascinating detail of his underwear. After seeing it again, it seems that it is a fleeting image and insignificant, almost subliminal, which probably go unnoticed in the context of a scene that does not pursue such exhibitions. However, the director returns to see the sequence in the company of writer and head of photography, especially taking into account the will of the actress clearly stipulated in their contract-to not include nudity or provocative images in history. It also provided for mounting the director and the head dress to contribute their views. And in the absence of consensus, they are joined by associate producer and executive producer, whose opinion as CFOs estimates of vital importance.
The debate, held in the darkness of a small screening room, is intense and contradictory, and forced to contemplate the decision in question several times (first in slow motion and then stopping at the critical moment) to focus the issue and facilitate the presentation of arguments. In the end, no choice but to agree on the ordered sequence, all just admit that there is no choice but to repeat it.
Text and image from Pedro Herrero
The debate, held in the darkness of a small screening room, is intense and contradictory, and forced to contemplate the decision in question several times (first in slow motion and then stopping at the critical moment) to focus the issue and facilitate the presentation of arguments. In the end, no choice but to agree on the ordered sequence, all just admit that there is no choice but to repeat it.
Text and image from Pedro Herrero
0 comments:
Post a Comment