victims gathered in the days 9 and May 10 this year, we discussed the draft Victims Act, which is in its fourth and final debate in the Senate. Regarding content, we note the following:
1. , The bill was not consulted with the victims, to legitimize it was necessary to an informed, concerted and appropriate for discussion and deliberation of the draft of the Law .
2. Major themes of the Bill is left to future regulatory by the Government, we are concerned that content regulation and not required by the participation of victims support the creation of a new institutional entities such as Social Action, in our experience has been negligent in recognizing our rights.
3. Should be extended the date for the recognition of victims and land restitution, as likewise expand the concept of family direct family.
4. That would be beneficiaries and also considered victims.
5. We believe violates our rights, to hold the reparation for victims to fiscal sustainability.
6. We consider counterproductive denial the Constitutional jurisprudence, the failure to differentiate measures of assistance and humanitarian aid remedies.
7. It is worrying that the victims of displacement, discrimination giving them administrative compensation core family, which amounts are due to help ance, given under the compensation.
is necessary, recognition of responsibility State and elimination of Article 9 of the Victims' Bill.
consider it essential deepening and development back guarantee of security for victims, advocates victims, court officials, and guarantees victim participation in the institutional spaces that as shown in the chapter on institutions, the space given to victims in relation to public officials is inequitable.
HUIPAZ
VIUNPA
Colombian Campaign LANDMINES
0 comments:
Post a Comment